The AP1000 pressurized water reactor has several design features that improve worker safety and production, as well as availability and capacity factors.
Improved Plant Performance
- 18-month fuel cycle for improved availability and reduced overall fuel cost
- Significantly reduced maintenance, testing and inspection requirements and staffing
- Reduced radiation exposure, less plant waste
- 93 percent availability
- Sixty-year design lifetime
Operations & Maintenance
An important aspect of the AP1000 PWR design philosophy focuses on plant operability and maintainability. The passive safety features use a much smaller number of valves than do the multiple trains of active pump-driven systems, and there are no safety pumps at all; so, there is less in-service testing to perform. In particular, simplified safety systems reduce surveillance requirements, significantly simplifying technical specifications and reducing the likelihood of forced shutdowns. Lower operating and maintenance requirements lead to smaller maintenance staffs.
The variable-speed canned-motor reactor coolant pumps (RCPs) simplify plant startup and shutdown operations because they are capable, for example, of reducing RCP speed during plant cooldown and providing the capability to vary RCP speed to better control shutdown operating-mode transitions. The RCPs operate at constant speed during power operations, simplifying control actions during load shifts.
The digital I&C design significantly reduces required I&C surveillance testing and simplifies trouble-shooting, repair and post-maintenance testing. The plant includes automation of some cooldown operations and improved steam-dump, low-pressure performance. The advanced control room design significantly improves the operator interfaces and plant operations capabilities.
Overall, the selection of proven components has been emphasized to ensure a high degree of reliability and reduced maintenance requirements. Component standardization reduces spare-parts inventories, maintenance, training requirements, and allows shorter maintenance times. Built-in testing capability is provided for critical components.
Plant layout ensures adequate access for inspection and maintenance. Laydown space provides for staging of equipment and personnel, equipment removal paths, and space to accommodate remotely operated service equipment and mobile units. Access platforms and lifting devices are provided at key locations, as are service provisions such as electrical power, demineralized water, breathing and service air, ventilation and lighting, and computer-data-highway connections.
The AP1000 plant also incorporates radiation exposure reduction principles to keep worker dose as low as reasonably achievable (ALARA). Exposure length, distance, shielding, and source reduction are fundamental criteria that are incorporated into the design with the result of:
- Minimized operational releases
- Worker radiation exposure greatly reduced
- Total radwaste volumes minimized through features such as no boron load follow, ion exchange rather than evaporation, segregation of wastes at the source, minimization of active components, and packaging in high-integrity containers
- Other (non-radioactive) hazardous wastes minimized through such features as a simplified plant (e.g., elimination of many oil lubricated pumps), careful selection of processes (e.g., laboratory and turbine-side chemistry), and segregation of wastes
The AP1000 plant is designated for rated performance with up to 10 percent of the steam-generator tubes plugged and with a maximum hot-leg temperature of 321.1°C (610°F). The plant is designed to accept a step-load increase or decrease of 10 percent between 25 and 100 percent power without reactor trip or steam-dump system actuation, provided that the rated power level is not exceeded. Further, the AP1000 plant is designed to accept a 100 percent load rejection from full power to house loads without a reactor trip or operation of the pressurizer or steam generator safety valves.
AP1000 PWR - Operating and Maintenance (O&M) Costs
Operating nuclear plants in the U.S. are already competitive producers of electricity compared to coal-fired plants. That virtue is enhanced by fuel cost comprising only about 25 percent of the production costs of a nuclear plant. The remaining 75 percent of production cost is the fixed cost of operation and maintenance.
That means that nuclear power production is less sensitive to changes in fuel costs than coal-fired plants where fuel costs can be more than 75 percent of the production cost. The AP1000 plant’s modern design will engender even less expensive production by requiring less manpower for O&M than current plants for many reasons, including:
- Less equipment and less safety-grade equipment to maintain and test
- Improved equipment, such as the primary system canned motor pumps that are maintenance-free and do not need the complex seal-injection systems of typical shaft-seal
- Features for faster head removal for refueling
- Less waste produced
- Improved protection from and fewer opportunities for radiation exposure (ALARA design)
- Online-diagnosing electronics
- A main control room featuring the latest human-interface design, needing only an operator
and supervisor for normal operation
An independent study by the Institute of Nuclear Power Operations (INPO) determined that a passive “single, mature Advanced Light Water Reactor” would require about one-third less O&M staff than a currently operating nuclear plant.